_edited.png)
The Effects of Vibration Treatment in Rhinoplasty
Dr. Süleyman Taş expands on vibration treatment after rhinoplasty, discussing edema, ecchymosis, pain, blood and lymphatic flow, low-magnitude high-frequency vibration and postoperative timing.
Publication Context
This Letter to the Editor by Süleyman Taş expands on the earlier Level 1 study The Effects of Vibration and Pressure Treatments in Early Postoperative Period of Rhinoplasty. It responds to comments about perioperative management, edema, ecchymosis, pain and the possible mechanisms through which vibration may influence postoperative recovery.
Perioperative Regimen
The response clarifies that the study groups were managed under the same perioperative conditions apart from pressure and vibration treatment. Patients did not receive arnica or other herbal supplements, steroids, or intraoperative/postoperative cooling. Closed rhinoplasty was performed under general anesthesia with hypotensive anesthesia targeting an average arterial pressure of approximately 60 mm Hg, and lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was administered close to incision sites. Head-of-bed elevation was routine.
Because these variables were standardized, the author argues that differences in swelling and bruising could be evaluated in relation to pressure and vibration rather than to other commonly used measures.
Vibration and Healing Mechanisms
The response discusses low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration (LMHFV) research in relation to mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblast activity, osteoclast activity, bone formation, collagen synthesis and musculoskeletal healing. These observations are presented as biologic rationale rather than definitive proof of the mechanism in rhinoplasty, and the author explicitly states that further research is required.
Mesenchymal stem cells are described as multipotent stromal cells capable of differentiating along myogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages, with immunomodulatory and angiogenic functions. The article proposes that stimulation of these pathways may be one mechanism through which vibration could influence inflammation and healing.
Pain, Lymphatic Flow and Edema
One of the stronger findings highlighted in the underlying clinical study was a reduction in postoperative pain. The response connects this with reduced inflammation and possibly less swelling and bruising. A second proposed mechanism is increased blood and lymphatic flow, which may reduce inflammatory stasis.
To illustrate fluid movement, the article describes an in-vitro experiment using two fresh chicken wings. Thirty milliliters of isotonic saline were injected into each specimen. Vibration was applied to one wing and not the other. After five minutes, approximately 7 mL drained from the vibrated specimen compared with 5 mL from the control specimen, a roughly 1.5-fold difference.
Timing and Clinical Caution
The author cautions against vibration treatment during the first three postoperative days because increased fluid movement could also increase bleeding during this early period. In the described clinical approach, vibration is therefore considered after the initial postoperative phase rather than immediately after surgery.
The vibrating nasal cast described in this work uses a thermoplastic cast, elastic bandage and vibrating motor and was patented by the author in Turkey (TR 2016 14675 B). The publication states that the invention was not commercially available at that time.
Conclusion
The article presents vibration as an innovative adjunct intended to reduce discomfort, pain, edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty. It also emphasizes that the physiologic mechanisms require continued investigation and that postoperative timing is important for safety.
Official Publication and External Source
Journal: Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Source-derived educational presentation of Dr. Süleyman Taş’s scientific publication; not individualized medical advice.
Comments